| For Immediate Release |
| DATE: JULY 18, 2008 |
BRENDA HODGE
SENATE OFFICE OF
COMMUNICATION |
| PHONE: (225) 342-9737 |
SENATE SAYS NO TO VETO SESSION
Senate
President Joel
Chaisson II announced today that 36 of 38 Senators have already
sent in their ballots, just one day after receiving them, to cancel
the veto session. By law the session was automatically set to begin
August 2, 2008 unless legislators decided otherwise. A veto session
can be cancelled with the consent of either 20 members of the Senate
or 53 members of the House.
"This was a bipartisan decision by an overwhelming majority of Senators,"
President Chaisson said, in praising his colleagues for their
decision. "Each Senator recognized that there are more productive
ways to address any differences of opinion with the Governor over
his line-item vetoes in the General and Supplemental Appropriation
bills than with a costly and time-consuming veto session."
Chaisson did, however, express his frustration with the Governor's
approach to dealing with legislators on projects in their districts.
"He vetoed some very worthwhile projects that have a tremendous
positive impact on the people they serve. To carelessly label all of
the projects he vetoed as 'slush funds' is disrespectful not only to
the citizens of this state who run those senior centers, youth
programs, Habitat for Humanity organizations, and other worthwhile
programs that help real people with real problems, but also to the
constituencies they serve - not to mention to the legislators who
worked so hard to address these significant needs in their
districts."
"As with any appropriations bill and as with any governor, there are
always projects that warrant a governor issuing line-item vetoes,
and this bill is no exception," President Chaisson said. "I respect
the Governor's constitutional authority to use the line-item veto.
However, the large number of vetoes, coupled with the complete lack
of criteria for local government projects, the confusion over how
the NGO 'regional impact' and 'state priority' criteria would be
applied, and the fairly small fiscal impact (i.e. 1/20 of 1% of the
state budget) suggests a failure of communication between the
Governor's office and legislators that resulted in many vetoes which
would have otherwise been avoided with appropriate attention during
the session to the budgeting process and respect for the
legislature's constitutional authority to appropriate funds."
Despite his concerns over the Governor's approach to the line-item
vetoes, Chaisson commended his colleagues for "taking a long-term
view towards governing and recognizing that there are many more
significant issues facing the state such as dealing with the
required $1.8 billion state match for federal levees in Southeast
Louisiana, addressing coastal erosion and the need to protect all of
our communities along the coast, finding ways to solve our problems
with healthcare and education, and strengthening our economy,
especially in rural Louisiana."
President Chaisson pledged to work with his colleagues to help the
Governor understand the importance and the need to better
communicate and work with the legislature to solve the many problems
we face in the state. "I hope that the Governor will re-focus his
attention on finding solutions to these Louisiana problems, in
partnership with members of the legislature, who have been so
instrumental to all of the successes we have enjoyed in the first
three sessions of this term," President Chaisson said. "The
Louisiana Senate will not take a back-seat when it comes to finding
ways to improve and move this state forward."